Cases 121 - 130 of 2,395
Constante v. Core Civic/Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 2:2018cv02647
Defendant:
J Guilin, Noland Espinda, Unknown Robertson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Constante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maugaotega v. Core Civic/Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 2:2018cv02648
Defendant:
J Guilin, Noland Espinda, Unknown Robertson and others
Plaintiff:
Miti Maugaotega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Manzo v. Rojas et al
as 1:2018cv01121
Defendant:
Robert Mbuya, F. Rojas, Keith Ivens and others
Plaintiff:
Juan J. Manzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Constante et al v. Core Civic/Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 2:2018cv02536
Defendant:
J Guilin, Noland Espinda, Unknown Robertson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Constante and Miti Maugaotega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurelio v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2018cv01974
Defendant:
Myra Walter, Michael Miller, Rick Raemisch and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J. Aurelio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leslie v. Montoya et al
as 2:2018cv02477
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Unknown Navaraez, Unknown Montoya and others
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Leslie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Liaux et al
as 1:2018cv00289
Defendant:
Kimoto, State of Hawaii Department of Public Safety, A. Asato and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Interested Party:
Shelley Nobriga, Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2018cv00167
Defendant:
Lieutenant Bowie, Grant, Warden Frink and others
Plaintiff:
Randy K. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Victor Tagle v. CCA
as 18-16373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR MANUEL TAGLE, Victor Tagle, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Victor Tagle v. CCA
as 18-16311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR MANUEL TAGLE, AKA Victor Tagle
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
