Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Caldwell v. U.S. Postal Service
as 1:2013cv20313
Plaintiff:
Emmett W. Caldwell
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Caldwell v. Condon et al
as 2:2012cv03638
Plaintiff:
Emmett W Caldwell
Defendant:
Judge I Condon, Judge Nicholson and Julie Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Caldwell v. Quicken Loans Inc
as 1:2012cv21531
Plaintiff:
Emmett W. Caldwell
Defendant:
Quicken Loans Inc , U.S. Recordings, Inc., Title Source Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caldwell v. U.S. Postal Service
as 1:2012cv20667
Plaintiff:
Emmett W. Caldwell
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv20675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Quicken Loans, Inc
as 0:2012cv60237
Defendant:
Quicken Loans Inc , US Recordings Inc, Title Source Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Emmett W. Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caldwell v. U.S. Treasury Dept. et al
as 1:2012cv20459
Plaintiff:
Emmett W. Caldwell
Defendant:
U.S. Treasury Dept., Office Comptroler of Currency State of South Carolina Probate Code Title 62, Irwin Condon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Starbucks Coffe Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv23197
Plaintiff:
Emmett W. Caldwell
Defendant:
Starbucks Coffe Co. Inc., Howard Schultz and Erica Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL v. WADSWORTH et al
as 1:2010cv00374
Plaintiff:
THE TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL
Defendant:
IRIS WADSWORTH, MCMASTERS STREET CONDOMINIUM HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, EMMETT W. CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CALDWELL v. DEATON et al
as 1:2010cv00223
Plaintiff:
EMMETT W. CALDWELL
Defendant:
CHRISTY DEATON, RACHEL EMERSON, DEBBIE BATCHELOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
