Cases 21 - 30 of 78
AT&T Inc., et al v. FCC, et al
as 16-1177
Petitioner:
AT&T Inc., AT&T Teleholdings, Inc., Illinois Bell Telephone Company and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee
AT&T, Inc., et al v. FCC, et al
as 16-1145
Petitioner:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Teleholdings, Inc., Illinois Bell Telephone Company and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
AT&T, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 16-1002
Petitioner:
AT&T, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Barcellos v. Milo et al
as 1:2015cv24460
Plaintiff:
Maria R Barcellos
Defendant:
Gerald L Milo and Rhonda M Milo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Phillips v. Hill et al
as 5:2015cv01628
Plaintiff:
Gary Alan Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
Chris Hill and Jane C Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Elko County Jail et al
as 3:2015cv00469
Defendant:
Elko County Jail, Elko County Sheriff and Kelsy Kline
Plaintiff:
Gary Lynn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Full Service Network, et al v. FCC, et al
as 15-1151
Petitioner:
Full Service Network, Truconnect Mobile, Sage Telecom, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Wireless Internet Service Providers Association, National Cable & Telecommunications Association, American Cable Association and others
AT&T, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 15-1092
Petitioner:
AT&T, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
AT&T Corp. v. FCC, et al
as 15-1059
Petitioner:
AT&T Corp.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Gary Phillips v. Nlyte Software Americas Ltd.
as 15-1262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY T. PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
NLYTE SOFTWARE AMERICAS LIMITED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
