Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Sims v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2011cv00090
Plaintiff:
Roger D Sims
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs , Arkansas Board of Parole , Leroy Brownlee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Bohannon et al
as 4:2011cv00275
Plaintiff:
Kasii Thomas
Defendant:
Carol V Bohannon, Leroy Brownlee and Darnell Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leach v. Brownlee et al
as 1:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Howard Lee Leach
Defendant:
Leroy Brownlee, Cleo Smith, Ray Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Williams et al
as 4:2011cv00219
Plaintiff:
Andre D McDaniel
Defendant:
James L Williams, Daniel E Scott, T Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Malik A. Khabir v. Benny Magness, et al
as 11-1153
Plaintiff:
Grady Newingham
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Malik A. Khabir
Defendant - Appellee:
Benny Magness, Chairman, Arkansas Board of Correction, Drew Baker, Vice Chairman, Arkansas Board of Correction, Kelly Pace, Arkansas Board of Correction and others
Sayres v. Brownlee et al
as 4:2010cv01537
Plaintiff:
Robert Sayres
Defendant:
Leroy Brownlee, Mike Beebe, Mike Pippen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plunkett v. Beebe et al
as 4:2010cv01104
Plaintiff:
James Wayne Plunkett
Defendant:
Mike Beebe, Wendy Kelly and Leroy Brownlee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Davis v. Larry Norris, et al
as 10-2555
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Randall Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Miriam Lester, Records Coordinator, Arkansas Department of Correction, Leroy Brownlee, Member, Arkansas Board of Correction and others
Davis v. Norris et al
as 5:2010cv00155
Plaintiff:
Charles Randall Davis
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Miriam Lester, Benny Magness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
