Cases 21 - 30 of 825,036
Wyatt v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
as 4:2024cv02305
Plaintiff:
Charles Martin Wyatt
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bral et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 2:2024cv03482
Plaintiff:
Sherry Khadavi Bral and Arash Alex Khadavi
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Bayer AG, Bayer CropScience Holding Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roldan v. County of Los Angeles, a public entity et al
as 2:2024cv03483
Plaintiff:
Jhonny Roldan
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, a public entity, 168 Realty Inc., Tony Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roldan v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al
as 2:2024cv03485
Plaintiff:
Jhonny Roldan
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, 168 Realty Inc., Tony Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hoglan et al v. M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657 et al
as 1:2024mc21628
Plaintiff:
Ju-Hsiu Jian, Jason Ruben Moreno, Christian B Stallworth and others
Defendant:
M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657, M/V Boceanica, IMO Number 9267132, M/V B Luminosa, IMO Number 9256016 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Griffin v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00982
Petitioner:
Troy M. Griffin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Edward Osborne v. PNC Bank, et al
as 24-11200
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L. OSBORNE
Defendant:
PNC BANK, YOUNG BOOZER and TONY S. ALLEN
Sheriff of Broward County v. Evanston Insurance Company
as 24-11230
Plaintiff:
SHERIFF OF BROWARD COUNTY
Defendant:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
