Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Mississippi matching "S"
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,922
Evans v. Updyke
as 3:2019cv00756
Plaintiff: Edwin Gilbert Evans
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Daniel Updyke
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Fikes v. Sollie et al
as 3:2019cv00755
Defendant: Tonya Anderson, Billy Sollie, Lauderdale County, Mississippi
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Ladarron Lashon Fikes
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Rivers
as 3:2019cv00749
Plaintiff: Johnnell Smith, Sr.
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Warden C. Rivers
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Snodgrass v. USA
as 1:2019cv00743
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Tiffany Snodgrass
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
Toomer v. Harris et al
as 1:2019cv00741
Plaintiff: Jesse Carl Toomer
Defendant: Jacklyn Myers, Amanda Harris, Unknown Caldwell
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Turner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00716
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Gregory L. Gill
Defendant: Mississippi State Penitentiary, Marshall Turner
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rankin v. USA
as 1:2019cv00715
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Demetrius S. Rankin
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
Casey v. Middlebrooks
as 1:2019cv00718
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Kendrick Lamont Casey
Defendant: Scott Middlebrooks
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graves v. Whitacre et al
as 1:2019cv00697
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Martin Hankins, Robert G. Whitacre
Plaintiff: Marshall P. Graves
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullum v. Dorsey
as 1:2019cv00699
Plaintiff: Cedric J. McCullum
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Monifa Dorsey
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?