Cases 101 - 110 of 825,036
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LOPEZ v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2024cv01750
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO LOPEZ
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
LISTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01784
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LISTER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICER REGINALD GRAHAM and JOHN DOES 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 72.92.23.138
as 2:2024cv01760
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 138
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
MR. SANDLESS FRANCHISE, LLC v. ARCHNOI et al
as 2:2024cv01765
Plaintiff:
MR. SANDLESS FRANCHISE, LLC
Defendant:
SURADEJ ARCHNOI and 3P&C GLOBAL CORP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Lyons v. Sade et al
as 4:2024cv01554
Plaintiff:
Charles Lyons
Defendant:
Yehonotan Sade, Vero Capital and US Living LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Odega v. State of Texas
as 4:2024cv01568
Plaintiff:
Edward Odega
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Davis Jr. v. Jose Chapa Law Firm
as 4:2024cv01561
Plaintiff:
Peter Davis Jr.
Defendant:
Jose Chapa Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Holmes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05317
Plaintiff:
Phoenix MayaRae Holmes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
