Cases 41 - 50 of 826,377
(PC) Kron v. Pouge et al
as 1:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kron
Defendant:
Tyson Pouge, Rodreguez, Seaborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemens v. Egeck et al
as 2:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
John Clemens
Defendant:
Michael R Egeck, Steven M Weddell, Yolanda Daniel and others
Parker v. Conduent HR Services, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02821
Plaintiff:
Philip Parker
Defendant:
Conduent HR Services, LLC and Conduent Business Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Dolls Kill, Inc. v. RebelsMarket, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02818
Plaintiff:
Dolls Kill, Inc.
Defendant:
RebelsMarket, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Licensing IP International S. r.l. v. mydirtyhobby.to et al
as 4:2024cv02800
Plaintiff:
Licensing IP International S. r.l.
Defendant:
mydirtyhobby.to, mdh.to and watchmdh.to
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Nowakowski v. AXT, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02778
Plaintiff:
Craig Nowakowski
Defendant:
AXT Inc., Morris S. Young and Gary L. Fischer
Woolard v. The Glad Products Company et al
as 3:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Craig Woolard
Defendant:
The Glad Products Company and The Clorox Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition
Perez-Perez v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00839
Petitioner:
Carlos Alberto Perez-Perez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Ronald L. Davis, Steven C. Stafford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
