Cases 51 - 60 of 826,602
County of Suffolk et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2024cv03498
Plaintiff:
County of Suffolk and OptumInsight, Inc
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Reed v. Hunsinger
as 3:2024cv00859
Petitioner:
Jeff Reed
Respondent:
Angela Hunsinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fundak v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
Darnald T. Fundak
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Puls v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02372
Plaintiff:
Patrick Puls
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lykins v. MPS Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Chris Lykins
Defendant:
MPS Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
VariChem International, Inc v. Riddle's Delhi & Chemical Service Co, Inc et al
as 4:2024cv01784
Plaintiff:
VariChem International, Inc
Defendant:
Riddle's Delhi & Chemical Service Co, Inc doing business as E&P Services Group, Pig Sweep LLC doing business as E&P Services Group and James A Allred, JR
Bibb v. Anderson Merchandisers, LLC
as 4:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Malynda Bibb
Defendant:
Anderson Merchandisers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Auth Token LLC v. Cadence Bank
as 2:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
Auth Token LLC
Defendant:
Cadence Bank
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Auth Token LLC v. Guaranty Bank & Trust, N.A.
as 2:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Auth Token LLC
Defendant:
Guaranty Bank & Trust, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Auth Token LLC v. Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Auth Token LLC
Defendant:
Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
