Cases 1 - 10 of 10,998
Amones et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation. et al
as 3:2024cv02763
Defendant:
Paramount Global, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Electrolux Home Products, Inc SII Copes-Vulcan and others
Plaintiff:
Ellen Amones, Johnathan Amones and Reid Amones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Dutschmann v. 84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership et al
as 3:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Dutschmann
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership, Ace Hardware Corporation, Advance Stores Company Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Viacom International Inc. et al v. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,
as 1:2024cv02329
Plaintiff:
Viacom International Inc. and Paws, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
VALENTINE SHABAZZ v. SOVEREIGN SWEETS et al
as 2:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
SOVEREIGN SWEETS, VINCENT WATSON, ANDRE DICKENS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Sarjeant et al v. City of Long Beach et al
as 3:2024cv01216
Defendant:
ALLIED FLUID PRODUCTS CORP., formerly known as ALLIED PACKING & SUPPLY, INC., KM Industries Holding Co., Inc., formerly known as Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc., Owl Companies, individually and as parent, alter-ego-equitable trustee, joint venture, and as succesoor-in-interest to Smith-Amelco and Owl Constuctors, formerly known as HC. Smith Construction Co. and others
Plaintiff:
James Sarjeant and Lucretia Sarjeant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00408
Interested Party:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alfa Laval, Inc. (sued indiv. and as sii to DeLaval Separator Company and Sharples Inc.), General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Scott L. Hultner et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Scott L Hultner, Geraldine E Hultner, Scott L. Hultner and others
Petitioner:
Alfa Laval, Inc. (sued indiv. and as sii to DeLaval Separator Company and Sharples Inc.)
Interested Party:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., General Electric Company, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. (sued individually and as succesor-in-interest to DELAVAL TURBINE, INC.) and others
Defendant:
Paramount Global, Redco Corporation, Air and Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hoff et al v. Avco Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Hoff and Nancy B. B. Hoff
Cross Defendant:
Avco Corporation, CNA Holdings, LLC, Cooper Industries, LLC and others
Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Cytec Industries, Inc, DCo LLC and others
Other:
Meritor Inc., The Dow Chemical Company, Morton International, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Bourgeois et al v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
David Bourgeois and Emelda Bourgeois
Defendant:
Pennsylvania General Insurance Company, Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Reilly Benton Company, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Bayer Crop-Science, Inc., Taylor Seidenbach, Inc., Hopeman Brothers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Jacob v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association et al
as 2:2023cv07414
Plaintiff:
Herbert J Jacob, Jr., Margaret R Jacob, Richard E Jacob and others
Defendant:
Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association, Eagle Inc., Bayer CropScience, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
