Cases 31 - 40 of 730
Aloba v. Yahoo Inc.
as 4:2022cv00311
Petitioner:
Oriyomi Aloba, Oriyomi Sadiq Aloba and Oriyomi Sadia Aloba
Defendant:
Yahoo Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilfling v. Yahoo, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02615
Plaintiff:
Michael Wilfling
Defendant:
Yahoo, Inc., DOES 1 through 10, and Yahoo, Inc. doing business as Yahoo News, a Delaware corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Linda Matlow v. Yahoo, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01540
Plaintiff:
Linda Matlow
Defendant:
Yahoo, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Suraju et al v. Yahoo!, Inc. et al
as 3:2022mc80072
Plaintiff:
Olanrewaju Suraju and The Human and Environmental Development Agenda
Defendant:
Yahoo!, Inc. and J.P. Morgan Chase, Inc.
WELLS v. U.S. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISION et al
as 1:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
KANDANCE A. WELLS
Defendant:
U.S. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISION, YAHOO, BLACK ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peter Pedersen v. Yahoo Inc. et al
as 6:2021cv01308
Plaintiff:
Peter Pedersen
Defendant:
Yahoo Inc. and Verizon Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Caston v. Murillo et al
as 1:2021cv05919
Plaintiff:
Charles Caston
Defendant:
Cathy Murillo, Erica Brown, Richard L. Braddock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howard v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv04163
Plaintiff:
Andrenique Howard
Defendant:
Corleon Davis, Corleon Phillips, Corleon Milles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caston v. Turner et al
as 1:2021cv05918
Plaintiff:
Charles Caston
Defendant:
Sylvester Turner, Houston Live Stock and Radio, Olympic Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re ex parte Application of Dr. Andr von Moos,
as 3:2021mc80258
In Re:
Dr. Andre von Moos
Defendant:
In Re
Not Classified By Court:
Google LLC and Yahoo Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
