Cases 81 - 90 of 193
Nobles v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01767
Plaintiff:
Ayanna Nobles
Defendant:
Doctor's Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. v. PATEL et al
as 1:2013cv01611
Plaintiff:
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC.
Defendant:
RAKESH B. PATEL and JAI SANTOSHIMA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
DOCTORS ASSOCIATES INC. v. PATEL et al
as 2:2013cv01375
Plaintiff:
DOCTORS ASSOCIATES INC.
Defendant:
KRUPA B. PATEL and BEKRUDE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Subway Development Corporation of Washington
as 3:2013cv00251
Plaintiff:
Doctor's Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Subway Development Corporation of Washington
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Gotter v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.
as 5:2013cv05033
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gotter
Defendant:
Doctor's Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROSEMAN v. SUBWAY SANDWICH SHOPS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00793
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ROSEMAN
Defendant:
SUBWAY SANDWICH SHOPS, INC. and DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
PENDRAK et al v. SUBWAY SANDWICH SHOPS, INC. et al
as 3:2013cv00918
Plaintiff:
CHARLES NOAH PENDRAK and JOHN FARLEY
Defendant:
SUBWAY SANDWICH SHOPS, INC. and DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Springer v. Doctor's Associates Inc.
as 2:2013cv00143
Defendant:
Doctor's Associates Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Springer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Gross v. Doctor's Associates Inc.
as 1:2013cv00601
Plaintiff:
Barry Gross
Defendant:
Doctor's Associates Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Springer v. Doctor's Associates Inc.
as 2:2013at00076
Defendant:
Doctor's Associates Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Springer
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
