Cases 11 - 20 of 155,784
Akinsanya v. Garland
as 24-1412
Petitioner:
RASHEED AKINSANYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
AMSBRY v. RIDEOUT
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GREGORY AMSBRY
Defendant:
CHARLES A RIDEOUT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
US BANK TRUST COMPANY NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. SICKLER et al
as 1:2024cv00143
Defendant:
BILLIE-JO R SICKLER, BILLIE-JO SICKLER and DANNY J SICKLER, II
Plaintiff:
US BANK TRUST COMPANY NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SHAPIRO v. CIANBRO INC
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
ADAM SHAPIRO
Defendant:
CIANBRO INC doing business as CIANBRO CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
v. American Tower Asset Sub II, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Defendant:
American Tower Asset Sub II, LLC and 289 Kilvert, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Santiago-Cortes v. Save Green Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv01190
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Santiago-Cortes
Defendant:
Save Green Corp., Save Green Fleet Maintenance, Inc., Jose R. Colon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BTL INDUSTRIES INC v. REJUVA FRESH LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
BTL INDUSTRIES INC
Defendant:
REJUVA FRESH LLC and POLLY JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Tyson et al v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2024cv11105
Plaintiff:
Charles Tyson and Jennifer Tyson
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Graham v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2024cv11100
Plaintiff:
Sonya Graham
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schermerhorn v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11088
Plaintiff:
Donald Schermerhorn
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
