Cases 31 - 40 of 6,252
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Henry Stubbs, III v. USA, et al
as 24-1735
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVETTE KANE, C. DARNELL JONES, II and others
Derrick Jacobs v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-1696
Plaintiff:
DERRICK U. JACOBS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and others
Elizabeth Sanchez, et al v. Elizabeth Board of Education, et al
as 24-1715
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH SANCHEZ, Guardian ad Litem, CHARLES SANCHEZ and E. S., a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem
Defendant:
ELIZABETH BOARD OF EDUCATION, JOSEPH TROIANO, JENNIFER CAMPEL and others
Dawn Keefer, et al v. President United States of America, et al
as 24-1716
Plaintiff:
DAWN KEEFER and TIMOTHY BONNER
Defendant:
PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA and SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Christopher Feliciani
as 24-1430
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. FELICIANI
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Superior Court of Pennsylvania
as 24-1415
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1321
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1336
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
