Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 85,075
IBRAHIM v. EMRICH et al
as 3:2024cv01780
Plaintiff: YUSUF IBRAHIM
Defendant: AMY EMRICH and DERRICK BODTMANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
IN RE: JAMES NORMAN ZIEGENFUSS, JR.
as 2:2024cv01846
Plaintiff: JAMES NORMAN ZIEGENFUSS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. LACOLMB et al
as 2:2024cv01843
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE
Defendant: PIERRE LACOLMB, C/O GINDRAW, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff: NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant: PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES BARNACLE, MICHAEL TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
KREASHKO v. GILPIN TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2024cv00288
Defendant: SOUTHERN ARMSTRONG REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT, GILPIN TOWNSHIP, GILPIN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff: DENNIS KREASHKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
WOODS v. WARDEN USP CANAAN
as 2:2024cv01833
Petitioner: MARK WOODS
Respondent: WARDEN USP CANAAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
IN RE: JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
as 2:2024cv01796
Plaintiff: JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nita Patel v. USA
as 24-1739
Plaintiff: NITA PATEL
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stovall v. Warden of SCI-Muncy et al
as 2:2024cv01839
Petitioner: ARCELIA TRUMAINE STOVALL
Respondent: Warden of SCI-Muncy and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. BRIGGZ et al
as 2:2024cv01813
Plaintiff: DUPREE WILLIAMS
Defendant: GREGORY BRIGGZ, C.O. ROBINSON, SAVASIA CARABALLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?