Cases 1 - 10 of 140,589
Robinson v. Beane et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Martin Riley Robinson
Defendant:
Honorable Judge John D. Beane, Russ Skogstad, Talia Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Tom's Plumbing, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Tom's Plumbing, Inc. doing business as Mullen Plumbing, Heating and Cooling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Henderson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ruth Henderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Su v. Ben's Creek Operations WV LLC
as 2:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Ben's Creek Operations WV LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
General Insurance Company of America v. Bossio
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
General Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Bernard Bossio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Hernandez v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Marco Hernandez
Defendant:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America v. $11,123.00 from Moneygram International, Inc., Money Orders
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$11,123.00 From Moneygram International, Inc., Money Orders
Varela v. Walmart Supercenter
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Elija Varela
Defendant:
Walmart Supercenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Donald v. USA
as 5:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
Reuben Jahmell Dauntez Donald
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
