Cases 1 - 10 of 66,545
Kindred v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00219
Petitioner:
Herman Lee Kindred
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darge v. Warden - Yazoo City Low
as 3:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Patrick Darge
Defendant:
Warden - Yazoo City Low
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Leal v. 371st District Court of Tarrant County, Texas
as 4:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Leal
Respondent:
371st District Court of Tarrant County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Director
as 5:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Reidie Jackson
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01546
Petitioner:
Johnny Richardson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayer v. Murrill et al
as 3:2024cv00320
Petitioner:
James Grayer
Respondent:
Liz Murrill and Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carson v. State of Texas
as 4:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
Michael James Carson
Respondent:
State of Texas and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00156
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jackson
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Liz Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bello v. Johnson
as 4:2024cv00363
Petitioner:
Olamide Olatayo Bello
Respondent:
Mark Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vidal v. King et al
as 3:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
Tommy Ray Vidal
Respondent:
Adam King and Leslie Rachael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
