Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 101 - 110 of 99,856
Smith v. Reynolds
as 2:2024cv02368
Petitioner: Gage L. Smith
Respondent: Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Watson
as 2:2024cv02365
Petitioner: Richard N. King
Respondent: Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kimes v. USA
as 2:2024cv00081
Petitioner: Andy Dennison Kimes
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wethington v. Parris et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff: Joseph Wethington
Defendant: Mike Parris, Stacy Oaks, Shawn Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burchfield v. Grimes
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff: Robert W Burchfield
Defendant: FNU Grimes and FNU Anderly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilchrease v. Dickerson
as 2:2024cv02320
Petitioner: Victericka Gilchrease
Respondent: Stanley Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeffrey Lewis v. USA
as 24-3411
Petitioner: JEFFREY LEWIS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Louis Fontanez v. Eric Rardin
as 24-1421
Petitioner: LOUIS JOHN FONTANEZ
Respondent: ERIC RARDIN, Warden
Dwayne Davis v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1238
Plaintiff: DWAYNE DAVIS, aka Dwayne Davis-El
Defendant: HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, in their personal capacity, LES PARISH, Warden, in their personal capacity, THOMAS P. MACKIE, Former Warden, in their personal capacity and others
Jones v. Heun We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01104
Plaintiff: Dewayne Jones and Abdul Haseeb Ibu Jones Bey
Defendant: Arthur "Art" Heun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?