Cases 51 - 60 of 158,115
RODRIGUEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv06221
Plaintiff:
JUANA J. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hendricks v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Terrie Lee Hendricks
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Estes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Thomas Brian Estes
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Perez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03744
Plaintiff:
Justina Valerio Perez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rywelski v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03554
Plaintiff:
Megan Rywelski
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Alberto Douglas Sanchez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Cain v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Jimmy R. Cain, Jr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
Jessica L. Williams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ramon Placencia v. Commissioner Social Security
as 24-1887
Plaintiff:
RAMON PLACENCIA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Archuleta v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Trudy Jeanne Archuleta
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
