Civil Rights Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 70,855
Doe #1 MKC et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00585
Plaintiff: John Doe #1 (MKC) and John Doe #2 (JAS)
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #066 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Plaintiff: John Doe #066
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00590
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02348
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Daville v. TransCanada USA Services Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02354
Plaintiff: Matthew Daville
Defendant: TransCanada USA Services Inc. and Rixey Broussard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Helton v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00588
Plaintiff: Ricky M. Helton
Defendant: Governor Bill Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burks v. Licking County Child Support Enforcement Agency
as 2:2024cv02330
Defendant: Licking County Child Support Enforcement Agency and CSEA
Plaintiff: Jordan Burks
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00273
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Noe v. Grainger County et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff: Glenn Noe
Defendant: Grainger County, Grainger Co Sheriff James Harville and Cody Bright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?