Cases 21 - 30 of 6,712
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Ash, Davenell v. Superior Police Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Superior Police Dept., Judge Kelly Thimm, Prosecutor Chad Lalor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Junco v. United Ground Express Inc
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Bryant Junco
Defendant:
United Ground Express Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vaughn v. Turek
as 2:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Vaughn
Defendant:
Karl Turek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Siegmann v. Frohling et al
as 2:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Daniel Leonard Siegmann
Defendant:
David W Frohling and Danielle J Van Egtern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Klumpp v. Washington County Courthouse et al
as 2:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Michael Klumpp
Defendant:
Washington County Courthouse, Jeff Jaeger and Officer Delmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nash v. Milwaukee County Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Monica D Nash
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Sheriff, Milwaukee County District Attorney's Office and Milwaukee County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bengston, Mitchell v. Carlson, Christen et al
as 3:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Mitchell E. Bengston
Defendant:
Christen A. Carlson, Eric P. Carlson, Peter Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
