Cases 61 - 70 of 2,896
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Hogan et al
as 4:2024cv04035
Plaintiff:
Jake Simmons
Defendant:
Heather Hogan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon Hollie v. Essentia Health, et al
as 24-1220
Plaintiff:
Shannon D. Hollie
Defendant:
Essentia Health, Moose Lake Clinic, Benjamin Marsh, Medical Doctor, Essentia Health; in their Official and Individual Capacities and Jane/John Does, Unknown Individuals; in their Official and Individual Capacities
Rayvon Boatman v. Wellpath Recovery Solutions, LLC, et al
as 24-10975
Plaintiff:
RAYVON BOATMAN
Defendant:
WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, DONALD SAWYER, EMILY SALEMA and others
Despart v. Hoang Le et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Despart and Thomas Despart
Defendant:
Yen Hoang Le, Antoria Blanding and Dr. Yen Hoang Le
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mouzon v. Alameda County
as 4:2024cv01907
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Mouzon
Defendant:
Alameda County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradbury v. Loman
as 5:2024cv01886
Plaintiff:
Brian G. Bradbury
Defendant:
Dr. Loman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale Williams, Sr. v. Nancy Moore, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
Dale Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Nancy Moore, Sara Kulas, MSOP--Moose Lake Group Supervisor Special Services, Samantha J. Suhonen, MSOP--Moose Lake mailroom personnel and others
Reevis v. Eastern State Hospital
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
Eastern State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
