Cases 21 - 30 of 10,008
THOMAS v. BIRKHEAD et al
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL THOMAS
Defendant:
SHERIFF CLARENCE F. BIRKHEAD, OFC. GLASSCOCK, WELLPATH, LLC d/b/a/ CORRECT CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISHMAN v. SLOCUMB et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY W. ISHMAN
Defendant:
OFFICER SLOCUMB, OFFICER JACKSON, CAPTAIN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUMITIE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00360
Petitioner:
THADDEUS THEOPALIS CRUMITIE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BALDWIN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00361
Petitioner:
LA'REGINALD TREDARIUS BALDWIN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ISHMAN v. SLOCUMB et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY W. ISHMAN
Defendant:
OFFICER SLOCUMB, LIEUTENANT THOMPSON, CAPTAIN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AUGHENBAUGH v. GREENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
RAYN ROBERT AUGHENBAUGH and RYAN ROBERT AUGHENBAUGH
Defendant:
GREENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, SERGEANT A.J. SMITH and LINDSAY GAINEY TA'KAIYA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. SURRY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE, et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Defendant:
JIMMIE CALVIN ANDERSON, SURRY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE and BRIAN COCKERHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIVETT v. USA
as 1:2024cv00353
Petitioner:
STEVEN ADRIAN KIVETT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
NORRIS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00341
Petitioner:
JONATHAN MORRISON NORRIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MASHORE v. NAVES
as 1:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
RODRIQUEZ DWAYNE MASHORE
Defendant:
SGT JASON JAGGER NAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
