Cases 41 - 50 of 10,602
Fleitas v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Carlos Fleitas
Respondent:
United States of America and E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dugan v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Jeremy Dugan
Respondent:
United States of America and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rice v. USA
as 1:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Joenell L. Rice
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Alleyne v. Tomlinson et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Alleyne
Defendant:
L. Tomlinson, P. Henry, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Lovett et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
William C. Brown
Defendant:
Warden Lovett and Dr. Gregory Mimms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lindsey v. Cutright
as 1:2024cv00205
Petitioner:
Shaun Lindsey
Respondent:
C. Cutright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, Tristin Tenney, Angel Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguon v. Hazelton F.C.I. Warden et al
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Robert L. Aguon
Respondent:
Hazelton F.C.I. Warden, S.I.S. and The O.I.G.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McClure v. Saint Marys Correctional Center Jail
as 5:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Christie Coy McClure, Jr.
Defendant:
Saint Marys Correctional Center Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
