Cases 91 - 100 of 111,952
DAVEY v. JEFFERSONVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
JERRY DAVEY, JR.
Defendant:
JEFFERSONVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LEAVELL, K. KAVANAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JORDAN v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
DENZEL JORDAN
Respondent:
WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
FEY v. WASHINGTON et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR WAYNE FEY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON and STEVE BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY-EL v. WARGNY et al
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
LERON EVERETT EASLEY-EL
Defendant:
CHLOE WARGNY and JOHN MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDS v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv00745
Petitioner:
RANDALL RICHARDS
Respondent:
DONALD EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. BELLO et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BELLO, BAKER, AKENADI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
KENNEDY EUGENE BUTLER
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and BRILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. SILVIA et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
SILVIA, DUNLAP, WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE et al v. SEGLER CONCRETE FINISHING LLC
as 1:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE, INDIANASTATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS and CEMENT MASONS HEALTH, WELFARE, PENSION FUNDS
Defendant:
SEGLER CONCRETE FINISHING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
