Cases 121 - 130 of 2,527
Randall v. City of Salem, MA, et al
as 23-1913
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN KENNETH RANDALL
Defendant / Appellee:
SALEM, MA and SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hernandez-Castrodad, et al v. Steidel Figueroa
as 23-1872
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE ERNESTO HERNANDEZ-CASTRODAD and IRIS MARTA MARCANO
Defendant / Appellee:
HON. SIGFRIDO STEIDEL FIGUEROA, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Administration of Tribunals of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (OAT)
Snell v. Zane, et al
as 23-1844
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMORY G. SNELL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM ZANE, RICHARD EVANS, LISA RICCOBENE and others
Ramos-Ramos, et al v. Olavarria-Cruz, et al
as 23-1940
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE A. RAMOS-RAMOS, ORLANDO MENDEZ-LOPEZ, IGNERIS A. PEREZ-ROSARIO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PHD MAYRA OLAVARRIA-CRUZ, in her official capacity as President of the University of Puerto Rico and SINDICATO DE TRABAJADORES DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE PUERTO RICO
Interested Party:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION and others
Withers v. Darigan
as 23-1845
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONYA WITHERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MELISSA E. DARIGAN, Rhode Island Superior Court Judge
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Withers v. McConnell
as 23-1847
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONYA WITHERS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN J. MCCONNELL, JR., Honorable
Logan, et al v. Antaya, et al
as 23-1808
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA A. LOGAN and EPHRAIM E. LOGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
HEATHER ANTAYA and LYNNE TOWNSEND, Senior Property Compliance Manager
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1874
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
