Cases 121 - 130 of 757
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, THE
as 1:2019cv01907
Defendant:
SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, THE
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
STEINBERG et al v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 3:2018cv16244
Plaintiff:
MICHAELA BANCK, GAMAL EL-ZOGHBY, MICHELE PIERRO and others
Defendant:
OFFICE OF MARITIME RESOURCES, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181
Delaware Restaurants, L.P. et al v. Talleyville Econ-O-Wash, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01707
Defendant:
Steve Kim and Talleyville Econ-O-Wash, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Concord Pike Associates, LLC and Delaware Restaurants, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VERSATILE METALS, INC.
as 2:2018cv04126
Defendant:
VERSATILE METALS, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CERTAINTEED CORPORATION
as 2:2018cv03614
Defendant:
CERTAINTEED CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
NEWARK EDUCATION WORKERS CAUCUS et al v. CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv11025
Defendant:
ANDREA ADEBOWALE, RAS BARAKA, CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
NEWARK EDUCATION WORKERS CAUCUS and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
New Jersey Dept. Environmental, et al v. American Thermoplastics Corp, et al
as 18-2865
Type:
Other Statutes
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. EPEC POLYMERS, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv11634
Defendant:
EPEC POLYMERS, INC., TRMI-H LLC, WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
PHILADELPHIA-HARBISON, L.P. v. SKF USA INC.
as 2:2018cv02938
Plaintiff:
PHILADELPHIA-HARBISON, L.P.
Defendant:
SKF USA INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
