Cases 121 - 130 of 20,875
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Mello v. Warren Housing Authority
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Schantelle Mello
Defendant:
Warren Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hasan v. ECFMG et al
as 1:2024cv10438
Plaintiff:
Dr. Prof Syed MK Hasan
Defendant:
ECFMG, Francine Katz, Katherin Oleyn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tempest v. State of RI Office of the Attorney General
as 24-1199
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND D. TEMPEST
Defendant:
RONALD PENNINGTON, Woonsocket Police Department Sergeant, in his individual and Official Capacity, RODNEY C. REMBLAD, Woonsocket Police Department Chief of Police, in his individual and Official Capacity and WOONSOCKET, RI, by and through its Treasurer Laurie Perry
Cross Defendant:
RI ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kersey v. My Job Mobile
as 1:2024cv11081
Plaintiff:
George Kersey
Defendant:
My Job Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
