Cases 131 - 140 of 426,119
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. TWO BAR DUDES LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
TWO BAR DUDES LLC doing business as SLIM'S IRISH PUB, KEVIN D. BEARD and VINCE FINAZZO
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unlawful Reception Broadcast Signal i.e., Satellite
HARDAWAY v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE 22ND-23RD et al
as 2:2024cv01782
Plaintiff:
AVERY J. HARDAWAY
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE 22ND-23RD, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY MINI POLICE STATION, ACME MARKETS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
GLENN
as 2:2024cv01792
Not Yet Classified:
PATRECE GLENN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
QUIGLEY v. SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY
as 2:2024cv01819
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND T. QUIGLEY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
FARKAS et al v. THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 5:2024cv01000
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA FARKAS and JOHN MURRAY
Defendant:
THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
STEVENSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2024cv00995
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STEVENSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Hornig v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
as 3:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Christine Hornig
Respondent:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
IN RE: JAMES NORMAN ZIEGENFUSS, JR.
as 2:2024cv01846
Plaintiff:
JAMES NORMAN ZIEGENFUSS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. LACOLMB et al
as 2:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
PIERRE LACOLMB, C/O GINDRAW, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDAWAY v. HARDAWAY et al
as 2:2024cv01801
Plaintiff:
AVERY JAMES HARDAWAY
Defendant:
RAYMOND J HARDAWAY and METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
