Cases 131 - 140 of 1,073
Towner v. Mississippi Regional Housing Authority V
as 3:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Dartiya Towner
Defendant:
Mississippi Regional Housing Authority V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garrett v. Happy State Bank
as 2:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
Leah Garrett
Defendant:
Happy State Bank
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Norsworthy v. Houston Indep Sch Dist
as 22-20586
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mary Norsworthy
Defendant / Appellee:
Houston Independent School District
Manfredini v. Quick Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2021cv02886
Plaintiff:
Jansen Manfredini
Defendant:
Quick Technologies Inc doing business as Sage, Eric Natinsky, David Natinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wyatt v. Bell Mechanical Services LLC
as 3:2022cv02618
Plaintiff:
Kimberly J. Wyatt
Defendant:
Bell Mechanical Services, LLC and Bell Mechanical Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Scott Loftin v. Credit Human Federal Credit Union, et al
as 5:2022cv01343
Plaintiff:
Scott Loftin
Defendant:
Credit Human Federal Credit Union and Brent Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Huggans v. National Bankruptcy Services LLC
as 3:2022cv02416
Plaintiff:
Robert Huggans
Defendant:
National Bankruptcy Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Mintz v. First Continental Mortgage, Ltd.
as 4:2022cv04062
Plaintiff:
Libby Mintz
Defendant:
First Continental Mortgage, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Hairston v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2022cv02645
Plaintiff:
Doctor Hairston
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Ozenne v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2022cv03694
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ozenne, Jr.
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
