Cases 141 - 150 of 76,810
Jacob v. Truist Bank
as 8:2024cv01176
Plaintiff:
Esther Jacob
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mazyck v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv01182
Petitioner:
Troy Mazyck
Respondent:
Warden of W.C.I. Ronald Shane Weber and Anthony Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darling v. Webber et al
as 1:2024cv01183
Petitioner:
Deshaune D. Darling
Respondent:
Webber and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zeller v. Reese et al
as 1:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
David Zeller
Defendant:
Ms. Reese and YesCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Omozee v. Hamadu et al
as 1:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Henry Omozee
Defendant:
Anehru Hamadu, Joshua Moses, Henry Igbinsosun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Lava Rock, LLC v. Setanta Development Capital, LLC
as 8:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
Lava Rock, LLC
Defendant:
Setanta Development Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Harried v. Prince George's County, Maryland
as 8:2024cv01190
Plaintiff:
Timothy F. Maloney
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY,MD and STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
