Cases 151 - 160 of 140,630
Morrison v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Ethan Morrison
Defendant:
Corporal Waylen Miller and Corporal N. Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez-Turcio v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00193
Petitioner:
Javier Alex Martinez-Turcio
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Forbes v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00194
Petitioner:
Dennis A. Forbes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reed v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
Corey Stephon Reed
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DiCocco v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Holly G. DiCocco
Defendant:
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Deidra Browder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Park v. USA
as 5:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Christopher Louis Park
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Smith v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Smith
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
VanNote v. Jackson County Magistrate Court et al
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Timothy VanNote
Defendant:
Jackson County Magistrate Court and Jackson County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00189
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
