Cases 21 - 30 of 10,132
Strong v. Cambridge Health Alliance
as 1:2024cv10968
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Strong
Defendant:
Cambridge Health Alliance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Strong v. North Suffolk Community Services
as 1:2024cv11030
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Strong
Defendant:
North Suffolk Community Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Strong v. USPS
as 1:2024cv11034
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Strong
Defendant:
USPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Strong v. YouTube(GOOGLE LLC)
as 1:2024cv11033
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Strong
Defendant:
YouTube(GOOGLE LLC)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Strong v. Boston Police Department A-7
as 1:2024cv11031
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Strong
Defendant:
Boston Police Department A-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Strong v. Xfinity Mobile Home
as 1:2024cv11032
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Strong
Defendant:
Xfinity Mobile Home
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reilly v. Town of Lexington et al
as 1:2024cv10415
Plaintiff:
Carol Reilly
Defendant:
Town of Lexington, Officer Steve Papia, Officer Joseph Carruthers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Kyros v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Dr. William M. Kyros, MD and Dr. William M. Kyros, M.D.
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, James A Diossa, Rhode Island Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Miller v. Roycroft, et al
as 24-1351
Plaintiff:
IAN MILLER, personal representative of the Estate of Robert Joseph Miller
Defendant:
SPENCER JACKSON, in his individual capacity, TOWN OF BARNSTABLE, MA and SEAN ROYCROFT, in his individual capacity
GRAHAM v. MAINEHEALTH, et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
PETER E GRAHAM, MD
Defendant:
MAINEHEALTH doing business as MAINEHEALTH CANCER CARE doing business as MAINE MEDICAL PARTNERS and AMIT SANYAL, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
