Cases 21 - 30 of 66,041
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Coleman v. Melcher et al
as 1:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
Thomas Coleman
Defendant:
Melcher and Illinois State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson, as Representative of the Estate of Jordan Richardson v. King et al
as 2:2024cv02113
Plaintiff:
Amy Richardson, as Representative of the Estate of Jordan Richardson
Defendant:
Jerry King and Village of Rantoul, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keener v. Cork et al
as 1:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Keener
Defendant:
Melanie Cork, Samuel Keirns, Ashley Skibinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
LAMPLEY v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
TOMMY LAMPLEY
Defendant:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMISSIONER OF I.D.O.C., KYLE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Charles Lewis, Sr., et al v. Matthias Elson
as 24-1807
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEWIS, SR. and MARIANNE LEWIS
Defendant:
MATTHIAS ELSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
