Cases 21 - 30 of 748
Williams v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Steven Williams
Defendant:
William Marshall, Jarrod Wilson, Jonathan Frame and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Londel Sanders
Defendant:
Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Whipple v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Robert Z. Whipple, III
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rutter v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Damien Rutter
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Corporal Michael Costello and Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Londel Sanders
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cunningham v. FCI Beckley
as 5:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Charles Muhammad Cunningham and Charles Muhammad Abdus-Shaheed Cunningham
Defendant:
FCI Beckley, Kitchen Manager Bailey, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mackey v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mackey
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Corporal Michael Costello and Director of Security Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kidd v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Douglas Kidd
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Dr. Lye, Sandra May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellinger v. North Central Regional Jail
as 5:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Emanuel Ellinger
Defendant:
North Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richison v. Chapman et al
as 2:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Richison
Defendant:
CO Aaron Chapman, CO Joel Hammer, CO Ashley Husk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
