Voting Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 21 - 30 of 134
Pendergrass et al v. Raffensperger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv05339
Plaintiff: Coakley Pendergrass, Triana Arnold James, Elliott Hennington and others
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca N. Sullivan, Sara Tindall Ghazal and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301 Denial or abridgement of right to vote on account of race or color
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP et al v. State of Georgia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv05338
Plaintiff: Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, Georgia Coalition for the Peoples Agenda, Inc. and Galeo Latino Community Development Fund, Inc.
Defendant: State of Georgia, Brian Kemp and Brad Raffensperger
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301 Denial or abridgement of right to vote on account of race or color
Whiteside v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2021cv03618
Plaintiff: Solicitor General Brian W. Whiteside
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca N. Sullivan, David Worley and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE and GEORGIA REPUBLICAN PARTY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
United States of America v. The State of Georgia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02575
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, The State of Georgia and The Georgia State Election Board
Plaintiff: United States of America
Intervenor Defendant: Republican National Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee and Georgia Republican Party Inc.
Amicus Curiae: Greater Georgia Action, Inc., American Center for Law and Justice, Members of Congress and others
Petitioner: Public Interest Legal Foundation and District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
Coalition for Good Governance et al v. Raffensperger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02070
Plaintiff: Georgia Advancing Progress Political Action Committee, Ryan Graham, Patricia Pullar and others
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, Anh Le, Rebecca N. Sullivan and others
Amicus Curiae: Georgia First Amendment Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2021cv02486
Plaintiff: Andrew W. Bell
Defendant: Chris Harvey and Brad Raffensperger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
The Concerned Black Clergy of Metropolitan Atlanta, Inc. et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2021cv01728
Plaintiff: Exousia Lighthouse International C.M., Inc., Sankofa United Church of Christ Limited, Greater Works Ministeries Network, Inc. and others
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, Anh Le, Rebecca Sullivan and others
Intervenor Defendant: National Republican Congressional Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee, Georgia Republican Party, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
Tyson et al v. Town of Homer, Georgia et al
as 2:2021cv00077
Defendant: Cliff Hill, James Dumas, Doug Cheek and others
Plaintiff: Annette Tyson, Banks County Golf, LLC, Amanda Acton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VoteAmerica et al v. Raffensperger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01390
Plaintiff: Voter Participation Center, VoteAmerica and Center for Voter Information
Defendant: Anh Le, Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca Sullivan and others
Petitioner: National Republican Senatorial Committee, Republican National Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Atlanta v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2021cv01333
Defendant: Anh Lee, Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca Sullivan and others
Plaintiff: Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Atlanta, Thuy Hang Tran, Thao Tran and others
Intervenor Defendant: Georgia Republican Party, Inc., National Republican Senatorial Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?