Cases 31 - 40 of 27,419
Lafleur et al v. Razor Oilfield Services LLC
as 6:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Shaphan Lafleur
Defendant:
Razor Oilfield Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Diffa v. Daikin Comfort Technologies, Manufacturing, LP
as 4:2024cv01377
Plaintiff:
Weniboebi Diffa
Defendant:
DAIKIN COMFORT TECHNOLOGIES, MANUFACTURING L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Conley v. Dennard et al
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Natalie Conley
Defendant:
Brad Dennard, Michael DeWyre, Patty Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Burton v. University Of Houston
as 4:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Martinique Burton
Defendant:
University Of Houston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Ali v. Rameesah Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01355
Plaintiff:
Mir Ajmal Ali
Defendant:
Rameesah Enterprises, Inc., Sadoor Khan and Mabroor Khan
Heredia v. GNG Times MK Hospitality SErvices, LLC
as 4:2024cv01357
Plaintiff:
Joe Heredia
Defendant:
GNG TIMES MK HOSPITALITY SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Murillo v. Chenega Global Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Angelica Murillo
Defendant:
Chenega Global Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 1463 Public Contracts: Unlawful Employment Prac
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Albright et al
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Teresa Thompson Albright and Sherry L. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Smith v. NFL Player
as 24-50277
Plaintiff:
Detron Smith
Defendant:
NFL Player Disability & Neurocognitive Benefit Plan
Mader v. CPG Catering, LLC
as 2:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Jacques Mader
Defendant:
CPG Catering, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
