Cases 31 - 40 of 9,284
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Randleman v. Firelands Habitat for Humanity, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Tonya L. Randleman
Defendant:
Firelands Habitat for Humanity, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
A.S. v. Mapleton Local School District et al.
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Mapleton Local School District, Mapleton Local School District Board of Education, Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shabazz v. King
as 1:2024cv00488
Defendant:
Mayor Brandon King
Plaintiff:
Lateek Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Shank v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00745
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Shank
Defendant:
Shelby W. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Delfino et al. v. Summit County, Ohio
as 5:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
Daniel Delfino, Mindy E. Delfino and State of Ohio
Defendant:
Summit County, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00459
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kramer v. Cedar Lee Special Improvement District
as 1:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Kramer
Defendant:
Cedar Lee Special Improvement District and City of Cleveland Heights
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
