Cases 41 - 50 of 5,624
Coykendall v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Coykendall
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Schutz v. USA
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Kayla Marie Schutz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Anthony Jermaine Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Almer v. Hanson et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Almer
Defendant:
Justin Hanson, Ronald Kind, Laif Rognlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WPX Energy Williston LLC v. Fettig et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
WPX Energy Williston LLC
Defendant:
Gabriel Fettig, Howard Fettig, Charles Fettig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Peach v. White Cloud et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
David Coty Peach
Defendant:
C.O. FNU White Cloud, C.O. FNU Herba and Sgt. FNU Wise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanfield v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Stanfield
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
H5 Transport, LLC v. Wallwork Truck Center, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
H5 Transport, LLC
Defendant:
Wallwork Truck Center, Inc. and Wallwork Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Sangster v. University of North Dakota
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sangster
Defendant:
University of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
