Cases 51 - 60 of 33,058
1453 FREID AVENUE LLC v. BOROUGH OF WOODBINE
as 1:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
1453 FREID AVENUE LLC
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF WOODBINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MITCHELL v. U.S. MARSHALLS
as 2:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
PAUL F. MITCHELL
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PARSONS v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2024cv05615
Plaintiff:
DEVIN PARSONS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CORRECTION OFFICER MELISSA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAMPBELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05642
Plaintiff:
DAMON CAMPBELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
SAALIH v. PITTSBURGH POLICE et al
as 2:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
ABDUL HAKEEM SAALIH
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH POLICE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY DA'S OFFICE, PITTSBURGH POLICE REVIEW BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lillian Graham v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-1707
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN GRAHAM
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS, PHILA POLICE DEPT 39TH DISTRICT and others
Lillian Graham v. FEMA, et al
as 24-1708
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN GRAHAM
Defendant:
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
KIM v. MOBILIA et al
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
SARA KIM
Defendant:
NICHOLAS C. MOBILIA, MICHELE S. HARTZELL and NORTH EAST SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GAGE v. BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE et al
as 2:2024cv05544
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I GAGE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE, KEITH J. LYNCH and WILLIAM F. WALDRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PATEL v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv05571
Plaintiff:
THE EXCELLENT RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ALL BIDEN CABINET MEMBERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
