Cases 51 - 60 of 231,038
Anderson #119801 v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry et al
as 2:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Anderson
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry and Ryan F Thornell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02652
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. USA
as 2:2024cv00846
Petitioner:
William Oliver Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brazee v. Imperial County Jail Medical Staff
as 3:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Brazee
Defendant:
Imperial County Jail Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Juan Zabdiel Vargas-Fentanes v. James Engelman
as 2:2024cv03433
Petitioner:
Juan Zabdiel Vargas-Fentanes
Respondent:
James Engelman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Van Keyshone Rollen v. C. Pfeiffer
as 5:2024cv00910
Petitioner:
Van Keyshone Rollen
Respondent:
Warden C. Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul Navarrete Quintana et al v. Cynthia E. Lermond et al
as 2:2024cv03524
Plaintiff:
Paul Navarrete Quintana
Defendant:
Cynthia E. Lermond, Melisa Jones, Nicole L. Paglione and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
