Cases 61 - 70 of 165,141
Rogers v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00817
Petitioner:
Victor Charles Rpgers and Victor Charles Rogers
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashlock v. Coke County et al
as 3:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lee Ashlock
Defendant:
Coke County, Midland County and Tom Green County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00218
Petitioner:
Douglas Ray Evans
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frickey v. Bickham
as 2:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Ryk Anthony Frickey
Defendant:
E. Dustin Bickham
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diez v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
James Logan Diez
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Warden Jerry Sanchez, Elbert Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Home et al
as 4:2024cv01656
Plaintiff:
Ivory R. Mitchell
Defendant:
Chief Home, Travis Turner, Joni White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kahoe v. Tiffany et al
as 3:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown Tiffany, Unknown Peridoux and Unknown Staff Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bustamante v. USA
as 3:2024cv01045
Petitioner:
Manuel Bustamante, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv01048
Petitioner:
Jim Wesley Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cole v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00110
Petitioner:
Benny L. Cole, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
