Cases 61 - 70 of 13,189
Patel v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Raj Patel
Defendant:
United States and President of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Eltiste et al v. Nautilus Insurance Company
as 9:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ryan Eltiste and Sharon Lynn Eltiste
Defendant:
Nautilus Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Martin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 9:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Kristin Martin
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In Re Tracey Godfrey
as 9:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Tracey Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morrison v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
James Morrison
Defendant:
United States of America, Indian Health Service Unit, Northern Cheyenne Services Unit, Billings Clinic and others
Vidrio Fuentes v. USA
as 2:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Juan Felipe Vidrio Fuentes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Khan v. Provident Life Accident Insurance Company (UNUM)
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Mansoor Khan
Defendant:
Provident Life Accident Insurance Company (UNUM)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Weber v. O'Connor
as 4:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Weber
Defendant:
Maureen O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schmasow v. Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa of Montana
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Sarah LeDeau Schmasow
Defendant:
Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa of Montana
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
McCall v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Melisa Diane McCall
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
