Cases 61 - 70 of 30,363
Holland v. Shew
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Brandon Neal Holland
Respondent:
Chris Shew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Drake v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02085
Petitioner:
Omarion Drake
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harris v. USA
as 3:2024cv00397
Petitioner:
Shari Lavelle Harris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Blankenship v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Evan William Blankenship
Defendant:
Ricky T. Buchanan, H. Helms and A. Scearse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. Barker et al
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Massey
Defendant:
Robert T. Barker, Curtis Tate, Peter Buchholte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddle v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Riddle
Defendant:
C.J. Wilson, Mark Gouge, William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03094
Plaintiff:
Bradly Mitchell Smith
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes-Cruz v. USA
as 1:2024cv00113
Petitioner:
Alejandro Reyes-Cruz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
THOMPSON v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
BRANDON E. THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM, DURHAM COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANGELA ASHBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. State of NC et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Respondent:
NC Department of Adult Public Safety, State of NC, NC Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Marshall Lee Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
