Cases 71 - 80 of 24,587
Desmond et al v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Desmond and Jose Moreta
Defendant:
Robert May, Jason Schaffer, Andrew Peruchi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RECANATI v. BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFFS et al
as 2:2024cv05131
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ANTHONY RECANATI
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF BERGEN, MICHAEL ALBANESE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Dauphin County Board of Prison Inspectors et al
as 1:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Brian Vasquez
Defendant:
Dauphin County Board of Prison Inspectors, Gregory Brigg, LaTonya Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fry v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Fry
Defendant:
Judge Megan Adams, A.G. James Betts, John Edinger, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. MCCRADY et al
as 2:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
ZAMA ELOAH BEY
Defendant:
JENNIFER MCCRADY and ATTORNEY LISA VANQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Records
as 1:2024mc00195
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Mike Records
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carl Bell v. Kim Ardery, et al
as 24-1373
Plaintiff:
CARL EDWARD BELL
Defendant:
KIM ARDERY, Medical Care Supervisor/CHCA at SCI- Benner Township, MORRIS HOUSER, Superintendent, GEORGE LITTLE, Secretary of Department of Corrections and others
JONES v. NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, BEN R. MICHAELS and JERRY M. HOBECK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SIRIANI v. KUHN et al
as 2:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSEPH SIRIANI
Defendant:
VICTORIA KUHN, MARC SIRE, U.C.H.C. UNIVERSITY CORR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
