Cases 71 - 80 of 30,407
Gaddy v. Alexander Correction Institution et al
as 5:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Brandon A Gaddy
Defendant:
Alexander Correction Institution, FNU Panero, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUMITIE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00360
Petitioner:
THADDEUS THEOPALIS CRUMITIE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BALDWIN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00361
Petitioner:
LA'REGINALD TREDARIUS BALDWIN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ISHMAN v. SLOCUMB et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY W. ISHMAN
Defendant:
OFFICER SLOCUMB, LIEUTENANT THOMPSON, CAPTAIN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AUGHENBAUGH v. GREENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
RAYN ROBERT AUGHENBAUGH and RYAN ROBERT AUGHENBAUGH
Defendant:
GREENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, SERGEANT A.J. SMITH and LINDSAY GAINEY TA'KAIYA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. SURRY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE, et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Defendant:
JIMMIE CALVIN ANDERSON, SURRY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE and BRIAN COCKERHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lebron v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02093
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Lebron
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cross v. Binns
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Rickey W. Cross
Defendant:
FNU Binns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ISHMAN v. SLOCUMB et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY W. ISHMAN
Defendant:
OFFICER SLOCUMB, OFFICER JACKSON, CAPTAIN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. McMillian et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU McMillian, Eric Dye, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
