Cases filed in Mississippi
Cases 71 - 80 of 50,392
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00832
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Employment Discrimination
Helix Robotics Solutions, Inc. v. LV North Ocean 105
as 1:2019cv00831
Plaintiff: Helix Robotics Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: LV North Ocean 105
Cause Of Action: Admiralty
Eddins v. Saul
as 3:2019cv00243
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Robert Lukas Eddins
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision
Crosslin et al v. Singh et al
as 3:2019cv00657
Plaintiff: Linda Crosslin, Robert Crosslin
Defendant: Daljit Singh, John Does 1-5, Citgo Petroleum Corporation
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal
Figuereo v. Gillis et al
as 5:2019cv00084
Defendant: Warden Shawn R. Gillis, Attorney General William P. Barr
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Petitioner: Lorenzo Figuereo
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McGee v. Jakobsen Motor Co et al
as 3:2019cv00788
Plaintiff: Kenyetta McGee
Defendant: Jakobsen Motor Co, Richard Lafever
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Ramirez v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv00785
Petitioner: Vincent Anthony Ramirez
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Starr v. Saul
as 3:2019cv00244
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: James William Starr
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision
Hart v. Rush Foundation Hospital et al
as 3:2019cv00787
Plaintiff: Eugene Hart
Defendant: Rush Foundation Hospital, MTC, Centurion Medical Services Providers
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Dodd et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2019cv00208
Plaintiff: Charles Dodd, Lacy Dodd
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?