Cases 81 - 90 of 32,839
Capuano v. Crane et al
as 5:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Alfred Capuano, III
Defendant:
Ofc Tyler Crane and Graves County KY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Perhne et al
as 5:2024cv10624
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Coleman
Defendant:
Perhne, McCumber-Hemry and Nagy
Poronto v. Hoist et al
as 4:2024cv10522
Plaintiff:
Andrew Poronto
Defendant:
T.D. Hoist, Sarah Breen, Kenneth Debus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. State of et al
as 4:2024cv11105
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, MDOC, G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility and others
Henderson v. Mike Dewine et al
as 2:2024cv02006
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Antonio Henderson
Defendant:
Mike Dewine, Amy Acton, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daugherty v. KY State Penitentiary et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
William J. Daugherty
Defendant:
KY State Penitentiary and Northpoint Training Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Derick Damrell v. Madison County Detention Center, et al
as 24-5205
Plaintiff:
DERICK DAMRELL
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT and FACILITY & MEDICAL STAFF
Phillips v. Marion County Sherriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Bryan R. Phillips
Defendant:
Marion County Sherriff's Department, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Holmes, Jr. v. Hamilton County, OH Government, et al
as 24-3341
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ISIAH HOLMES, JR.
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY, OH GOVERNMENT, STACEY DEGRAFFENREID and JOSEPH T. DETERS
Terrance Brown v. Robert Wier, et al
as 24-5386
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE BROWN
Defendant:
JUDGE ROBERT E. WIER, CHIEF JUDGE DANNY C. REEVES and SENIOR JUDGE JOSEPH M. HOOD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
