Cases 81 - 90 of 4,605
FRANKLIN v. TOWN OF NORWOOD et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SCOTT FRANKLIN
Defendant:
TOWN OF NORWOOD, TRENTEN JAMAR WEATHERS, JOHNATHAN LEE FURR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA and KOURY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Smith v Polk County, et al
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Wayne Smith and Wayne K. Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Polk County, Timothy Wright, Timothy L. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Oxendine v. Urban Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Oxendine
Defendant:
Urban Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BANKS v. ALAMANCE-BURLINGTON BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 1:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
Keisha Banks
Defendant:
ALAMANCE-BURLINGTON BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lee v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Sheila Lee
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, M O'hara, Officer Rodiguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. Sumner
as 5:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Quentin T. Sumner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baldwin v. Maiden Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Keith Baldwin, Jr.
Defendant:
Maiden Police Department and Jamey Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEE COUNTY v. HAUBER
as 1:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
LEE COUNTY
Defendant:
CHAD HAUBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
