Cases 81 - 90 of 30,333
RINKER v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
ADONIS ROBERT RINKER
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC., MICHAEL CECIL, BRIDGEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00699
Petitioner:
JOHN HARRIS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00176
Petitioner:
Darwin Lewis
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Darwin Lewis
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EVANS v. RUTLEDGE et al
as 1:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EVANS
Defendant:
MELISSA RUTLEDGE, BRYAN VANDERVORT and ISAAC RANDOLPH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOVALL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. STOVALL
Defendant:
VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOVALL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. STOVALL
Defendant:
VANIHEL, BOBBIE RIGGS, BURD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRIPP v. JAIL COMMANDER et al
as 1:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
TERRY W. TRIPP
Defendant:
JAIL COMMANDER, WELPATH HEALTHCARE SERV., WELPATH NURSES (UNKNOWN) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLINTON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00419
Petitioner:
DAYONTA MCCLINTON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
